Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


Lawyer who directs parental child abduction

A surprising fact was reported at the House of Councilors Legal Committee on March 24, this year. On May 15, 2018, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Bar Association held the "Legal Custody (Physical Custody) of Children and the Hague Convention Seminar for International Marriage" in Paris, where parents were advised on how to abduct their children.

The Hague Convention is officially called the "Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." In order to solve the international child abduction issue, the convention consists of processes for returning a child to the country of original habitual residence and securing the exercise of rights of access for both parents. Japan ratified the Hague Convention in 2014.

At the seminar in Paris, Toshiteru Shibaike, a lawyer sent by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, gave a lecture on the Hague Convention to Japanese parents (mainly mothers) living in France. Shibaike, who wrote The International Human Rights Law Practice Handbook, (co-written with Mikiko Otani, a lawyer and a member of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child) is widely known as a human rights lawyer.

Everything Shibaike said in Paris was recorded by one of the participants. According to the recorded content, he did not advise the participants in a way that was consistent with the spirit of the Hague Convention. This would have been to discuss how couples could divorce amicably whilst putting the needs of their children first. On the contrary, he specifically advised how to violate a child's rights by suggesting how it would be possible to take a child to Japan without having the Hague Convention applied.

For example, he explained, "All of you want to know that after you come back to Japan with your children, they would not be returned even if the claim will be made by the Hague Convention. I would like to talk a little about it...When your case does not meet the requirements of return refusal, none of them are satisfied, then you may think you must return your children if the trial is carried out in Japan. It’s not true because the Japanese court can decide whether to return or not by agreement, which is the unique characteristic of Japanese court and Japanese Hague cases. So you do not need to give up."

Japanese unique rules

The Hague Convention consists of 45 articles. Among them, only two articles refer to the requirements to refuse the return of the child. It is apparent from this that the main focus of this convention is not to refuse to return the child to their habitual living place. This is only allowed in extremely exceptional circumstances. This is understandable as it is a treaty designed to prevent the abduction of children. Nonetheless, Shibaike explained in detail for 30 minutes what to do in order to satisfy the requirements of this return refusal, despite the fact it doesn't apply to the majority of cases. It is highly logical therefore, that this event could be referred to as a Child Abduction Solicitation seminar.

How is it possible to abduct children? The explanation of Shibaike is quoted below:
"Look at the articles briefly. Articles are important, so let's look at them.... There is Article 28. Article 28 provides the grounds for refusal to return. If you satisfy the grounds stated here, you are allowed to not return the child...See this Article 28, it states that the court shall not order the return of a child if there is a grave risk that his/her return to the state of habitual residence would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation... Looking at this paragraph, it seems that the grave risk does not include domestic violence against mothers...But the other paragraph provides that the grave risk as stated above includes a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child, if the respondent and the child entered into the State of habitual residence. The respondent written here means mothers, or all of you. The respondent means those who must respond to the petition based upon the Hague convention. In other words, the respondent is those who take their children. The article provides that whether or not to return the children depends upon the risk that the wife would be subject to violence by her husband to cause psychological harm to the child, if (the wife and) the child comes back to France.”

Anyone who has read the articles of the Hague Convention should be skeptical of Shibaike's explanation. This is because the Hague Convention has no provisions for domestic violence as grounds for refusal of the return of the child.

関連する投稿


森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

朝日をはじめとするマスコミの常軌を逸した森喜朗氏への“集団リンチ”。 朝日の手の内を知り尽くした筆者が、その裏に隠された真の目的を暴く!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!


北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

今こそ問うべきだ。世界を大中華主義で染めたいのか。人権弾圧を続けて民主主義を息絶えさせたいのか。国際法を中華の法の支配に替え、世界秩序を大転換したいのか、と。


『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『目に見えぬ侵略』『見えない手』の入門書と言える『副読本』を発売! 二冊の大著から奥山真司氏監修のもとエッセンスを抜き出し、見開き40項目だけでシンプルに解説しています。その中から三項目を特別公開。今回は二つ目「人権」問題について。


中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

国連に代表される国際社会の人権への取り組みは、中国に対して圧力をかけられない構造的欠陥を抱えている。国連の外で中国の人権侵害を厳しく監視、調査する常設機関を設けることが必要だ。その具体策を探る。


最新の投稿


月刊『Hanada』2021年9月五輪熱中号

月刊『Hanada』2021年9月五輪熱中号

「菅首相、衆院選目標『私は欲張り』」(時事)、「首相、憲法改正『挑戦したい』」(共同)、「首相改憲に意欲『コロナに打ち勝った後に挑戦』」(産経新聞)、「菅首相 衆院解散時期 “コロナを収束させていく中で”」(NHK)など、菅義偉総理が国民の疑問と不安にすべて答えた「独占インタビュー」が早くも各メディアで話題に!総力大特集「中国共産党100年の大罪」、橋本聖子会長「五輪、無観客 決断の舞台裏」、「激突大討論!稲田朋美×小川榮太郎」、「朝日新聞崩壊の全真実」など9月号も読みどころが満載!読みたいニュース、知りたいニュースがここにある!


中国経済「死に至る病」(上)

中国経済「死に至る病」(上)

中国経済は本当にV字回復しているのか?経済成長の内実を示すいくつかの数字を詳細に分析することで判明した中国経済の実像と不治の病。


被災者に寄り添うとは|佐伯啓思

被災者に寄り添うとは|佐伯啓思

近代文明は、常に明るい未来を強迫観念的に展望し、過ぎ去った悲惨も犠牲となった死者も忘却へ押しやろうとしてきた。だが、一人一人のこころのうちから惨禍や死者の記憶を消すことはできない。


東京五輪開催は日本にとって最大のチャンスだ|猪瀬直樹

東京五輪開催は日本にとって最大のチャンスだ|猪瀬直樹

「オリンピック出て行け」などと叫んでいる人たちを見ると、まるで鎖国していたころの尊皇攘夷派と一緒だという気がしてならない。 コロナ禍のいまだからこそ、人間の限界に挑戦する選手の活躍から勇気をもらうことが「夢の力」につながる。  


立憲民主党は日本に絶対必要ない~難癖・大嘘・職務怠慢の実態|馬場伸幸

立憲民主党は日本に絶対必要ない~難癖・大嘘・職務怠慢の実態|馬場伸幸

理念も信念も何もない。ただただ、自分が議員バッヂをつけて国会議員でいられさえすればそれでいい。そのためだったらイデオロギーもポリシーもかなぐり捨てて、共産党であろうと手を組む。そんな政党は日本にとって百害あって一利なしだ!何度でも断言する、立憲民主党は日本に絶対必要ない!