Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


Lawyer who directs parental child abduction

A surprising fact was reported at the House of Councilors Legal Committee on March 24, this year. On May 15, 2018, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Bar Association held the "Legal Custody (Physical Custody) of Children and the Hague Convention Seminar for International Marriage" in Paris, where parents were advised on how to abduct their children.

The Hague Convention is officially called the "Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." In order to solve the international child abduction issue, the convention consists of processes for returning a child to the country of original habitual residence and securing the exercise of rights of access for both parents. Japan ratified the Hague Convention in 2014.

At the seminar in Paris, Toshiteru Shibaike, a lawyer sent by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, gave a lecture on the Hague Convention to Japanese parents (mainly mothers) living in France. Shibaike, who wrote The International Human Rights Law Practice Handbook, (co-written with Mikiko Otani, a lawyer and a member of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child) is widely known as a human rights lawyer.

Everything Shibaike said in Paris was recorded by one of the participants. According to the recorded content, he did not advise the participants in a way that was consistent with the spirit of the Hague Convention. This would have been to discuss how couples could divorce amicably whilst putting the needs of their children first. On the contrary, he specifically advised how to violate a child's rights by suggesting how it would be possible to take a child to Japan without having the Hague Convention applied.

For example, he explained, "All of you want to know that after you come back to Japan with your children, they would not be returned even if the claim will be made by the Hague Convention. I would like to talk a little about it...When your case does not meet the requirements of return refusal, none of them are satisfied, then you may think you must return your children if the trial is carried out in Japan. It’s not true because the Japanese court can decide whether to return or not by agreement, which is the unique characteristic of Japanese court and Japanese Hague cases. So you do not need to give up."

Japanese unique rules

The Hague Convention consists of 45 articles. Among them, only two articles refer to the requirements to refuse the return of the child. It is apparent from this that the main focus of this convention is not to refuse to return the child to their habitual living place. This is only allowed in extremely exceptional circumstances. This is understandable as it is a treaty designed to prevent the abduction of children. Nonetheless, Shibaike explained in detail for 30 minutes what to do in order to satisfy the requirements of this return refusal, despite the fact it doesn't apply to the majority of cases. It is highly logical therefore, that this event could be referred to as a Child Abduction Solicitation seminar.

How is it possible to abduct children? The explanation of Shibaike is quoted below:
"Look at the articles briefly. Articles are important, so let's look at them.... There is Article 28. Article 28 provides the grounds for refusal to return. If you satisfy the grounds stated here, you are allowed to not return the child...See this Article 28, it states that the court shall not order the return of a child if there is a grave risk that his/her return to the state of habitual residence would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation... Looking at this paragraph, it seems that the grave risk does not include domestic violence against mothers...But the other paragraph provides that the grave risk as stated above includes a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child, if the respondent and the child entered into the State of habitual residence. The respondent written here means mothers, or all of you. The respondent means those who must respond to the petition based upon the Hague convention. In other words, the respondent is those who take their children. The article provides that whether or not to return the children depends upon the risk that the wife would be subject to violence by her husband to cause psychological harm to the child, if (the wife and) the child comes back to France.”

Anyone who has read the articles of the Hague Convention should be skeptical of Shibaike's explanation. This is because the Hague Convention has no provisions for domestic violence as grounds for refusal of the return of the child.

関連する投稿


森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

朝日をはじめとするマスコミの常軌を逸した森喜朗氏への“集団リンチ”。 朝日の手の内を知り尽くした筆者が、その裏に隠された真の目的を暴く!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!


北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

今こそ問うべきだ。世界を大中華主義で染めたいのか。人権弾圧を続けて民主主義を息絶えさせたいのか。国際法を中華の法の支配に替え、世界秩序を大転換したいのか、と。


『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『目に見えぬ侵略』『見えない手』の入門書と言える『副読本』を発売! 二冊の大著から奥山真司氏監修のもとエッセンスを抜き出し、見開き40項目だけでシンプルに解説しています。その中から三項目を特別公開。今回は二つ目「人権」問題について。


中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

国連に代表される国際社会の人権への取り組みは、中国に対して圧力をかけられない構造的欠陥を抱えている。国連の外で中国の人権侵害を厳しく監視、調査する常設機関を設けることが必要だ。その具体策を探る。


最新の投稿


美しい日本の姿を国葬で示そう|櫻井よしこ

美しい日本の姿を国葬で示そう|櫻井よしこ

肉体は滅びても死者の魂は日本国の空、深い森や清らかな水辺のどこかにいらして、生者である私たちと日本国を見守って下さっている、と信じている。日本国のために闘い続けた安倍氏への深い感謝を国民こぞって静かに捧げる美しい日本の姿を国葬儀で世界に示そう。


日中国交正常化50年 中国の横暴を防ぐ出発点に!|和田政宗

日中国交正常化50年 中国の横暴を防ぐ出発点に!|和田政宗

「中国は低姿勢だったが、50年たったら態度はガラッと変わる。大きく経済発展して日本を見下すようになるよ」(時事通信)。当時の大平正芳外務大臣の予言だが、まさにその通りの状況になった。今こそ国交正常化以降の50年を、中国対応を誤った50年として反省すべきだ。


【日本原論】サタンに敗けない![冒頭先行公開]

【日本原論】サタンに敗けない![冒頭先行公開]

旧統一教会を巡る問題について、「サンデージャポン」での「爆笑問題」の太田光の発言がまたもや炎上。「#太田光をテレビに出すな」がTwitterでトレンド入りまでした。太田光は何を思う……本誌人気連載「日本原論」で大いに語った!


「ケツ舐め記者」と誹謗する金平茂紀の正体|山口敬之【WEB連載第17回】

「ケツ舐め記者」と誹謗する金平茂紀の正体|山口敬之【WEB連載第17回】

9月17日、金平茂紀氏はFacebookにこう投稿した。《この国にも「ケツ舐め記者」という連中が少なからず棲息していて、権力者、独裁者、ご主人様の局所を舐めて、その対価として「ご褒美」をもらって、それを得意げに広報し、「独自」「スクープ」とかのワッペンを自分で貼りつけて(中略)男性にも女性にも、もちろんいます、「ケツ舐め記者」は》。金平氏は、一体何様のつもりなのか。


日米共同演習でロシアを牽制せよ|岩田清文

日米共同演習でロシアを牽制せよ|岩田清文

今、米国が最も神経を使っているのは、今後、ウクライナの反撃が進展し、東部2州あるいは、クリミアまでをも奪還できる状況になった時、それをどこまで許容するかという点であろう。