Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


Lawyer who directs parental child abduction

A surprising fact was reported at the House of Councilors Legal Committee on March 24, this year. On May 15, 2018, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Bar Association held the "Legal Custody (Physical Custody) of Children and the Hague Convention Seminar for International Marriage" in Paris, where parents were advised on how to abduct their children.

The Hague Convention is officially called the "Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." In order to solve the international child abduction issue, the convention consists of processes for returning a child to the country of original habitual residence and securing the exercise of rights of access for both parents. Japan ratified the Hague Convention in 2014.

At the seminar in Paris, Toshiteru Shibaike, a lawyer sent by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, gave a lecture on the Hague Convention to Japanese parents (mainly mothers) living in France. Shibaike, who wrote The International Human Rights Law Practice Handbook, (co-written with Mikiko Otani, a lawyer and a member of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child) is widely known as a human rights lawyer.

Everything Shibaike said in Paris was recorded by one of the participants. According to the recorded content, he did not advise the participants in a way that was consistent with the spirit of the Hague Convention. This would have been to discuss how couples could divorce amicably whilst putting the needs of their children first. On the contrary, he specifically advised how to violate a child's rights by suggesting how it would be possible to take a child to Japan without having the Hague Convention applied.

For example, he explained, "All of you want to know that after you come back to Japan with your children, they would not be returned even if the claim will be made by the Hague Convention. I would like to talk a little about it...When your case does not meet the requirements of return refusal, none of them are satisfied, then you may think you must return your children if the trial is carried out in Japan. It’s not true because the Japanese court can decide whether to return or not by agreement, which is the unique characteristic of Japanese court and Japanese Hague cases. So you do not need to give up."

Japanese unique rules

The Hague Convention consists of 45 articles. Among them, only two articles refer to the requirements to refuse the return of the child. It is apparent from this that the main focus of this convention is not to refuse to return the child to their habitual living place. This is only allowed in extremely exceptional circumstances. This is understandable as it is a treaty designed to prevent the abduction of children. Nonetheless, Shibaike explained in detail for 30 minutes what to do in order to satisfy the requirements of this return refusal, despite the fact it doesn't apply to the majority of cases. It is highly logical therefore, that this event could be referred to as a Child Abduction Solicitation seminar.

How is it possible to abduct children? The explanation of Shibaike is quoted below:
"Look at the articles briefly. Articles are important, so let's look at them.... There is Article 28. Article 28 provides the grounds for refusal to return. If you satisfy the grounds stated here, you are allowed to not return the child...See this Article 28, it states that the court shall not order the return of a child if there is a grave risk that his/her return to the state of habitual residence would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation... Looking at this paragraph, it seems that the grave risk does not include domestic violence against mothers...But the other paragraph provides that the grave risk as stated above includes a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child, if the respondent and the child entered into the State of habitual residence. The respondent written here means mothers, or all of you. The respondent means those who must respond to the petition based upon the Hague convention. In other words, the respondent is those who take their children. The article provides that whether or not to return the children depends upon the risk that the wife would be subject to violence by her husband to cause psychological harm to the child, if (the wife and) the child comes back to France.”

Anyone who has read the articles of the Hague Convention should be skeptical of Shibaike's explanation. This is because the Hague Convention has no provisions for domestic violence as grounds for refusal of the return of the child.

関連する投稿


森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

朝日をはじめとするマスコミの常軌を逸した森喜朗氏への“集団リンチ”。 朝日の手の内を知り尽くした筆者が、その裏に隠された真の目的を暴く!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!


北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

今こそ問うべきだ。世界を大中華主義で染めたいのか。人権弾圧を続けて民主主義を息絶えさせたいのか。国際法を中華の法の支配に替え、世界秩序を大転換したいのか、と。


『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『目に見えぬ侵略』『見えない手』の入門書と言える『副読本』を発売! 二冊の大著から奥山真司氏監修のもとエッセンスを抜き出し、見開き40項目だけでシンプルに解説しています。その中から三項目を特別公開。今回は二つ目「人権」問題について。


中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

国連に代表される国際社会の人権への取り組みは、中国に対して圧力をかけられない構造的欠陥を抱えている。国連の外で中国の人権侵害を厳しく監視、調査する常設機関を設けることが必要だ。その具体策を探る。


最新の投稿


光に満ちた悲劇、安倍晋三とヤマトタケル|櫻井よしこ

光に満ちた悲劇、安倍晋三とヤマトタケル|櫻井よしこ

安倍晋三元総理はなぜ死ななければならなかったのだろうか。なぜテロに斃れなければならなかったのか。なぜ日本の警察と公安の弛緩しきった警備体制の犠牲にならなければならなかったのか。櫻井よしこ氏が綴った慟哭の30枚。


両親が覚悟の独占告白!国政を動かす「小川さゆり」の真実|福田ますみ

両親が覚悟の独占告白!国政を動かす「小川さゆり」の真実|福田ますみ

メディアが連日報じる元宗教二世・「小川さゆり氏」の壮絶な体験。日本外国特派員協会でも涙ながらの会見を行い、与野党のヒアリングに応じるなど、その発言は国政にも大きな影響を及ぼしている。だが、彼女の発言は果たして本当なのか? なぜ一切検証されないのか? 「このままではいけない」と彼女の両親が決意の告白を行った。当事者の声を追ったノンフィクション作家・福田ますみ氏渾身のルポ。


与党にはびこる〝中国共産党代理人〟|長尾たかし

与党にはびこる〝中国共産党代理人〟|長尾たかし

欧米各国が中国による人権侵害を事実認定して、政府や議会において対応すべく法整備が整っているのに、なぜ日本だけは一歩も前に進めないのでしょうか。永田町、霞が関の広範囲にわたって、中国共産党の呪いがかけられているとしか思えません――。


安保3文書履行に早くも暗雲|太田文雄

安保3文書履行に早くも暗雲|太田文雄

2+2の共同発表は昨年末に政府が決定した安保3文書を踏まえている。沖縄県による下地島空港の「軍事利用」拒否は、民間空港・港湾の利用拡大をうたった3文書の履行に背を向けることを意味する。


「ピークパワーの罠」に向かう中国|湯浅博

「ピークパワーの罠」に向かう中国|湯浅博

問題は、国力のピークを迎えた新興大国が一転、迫り来る衰退を恐れると、他国に攻撃的になるという「ピークパワーの罠」が現実味を帯びてくることである。