Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


Lawyer who directs parental child abduction

A surprising fact was reported at the House of Councilors Legal Committee on March 24, this year. On May 15, 2018, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Bar Association held the "Legal Custody (Physical Custody) of Children and the Hague Convention Seminar for International Marriage" in Paris, where parents were advised on how to abduct their children.

The Hague Convention is officially called the "Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." In order to solve the international child abduction issue, the convention consists of processes for returning a child to the country of original habitual residence and securing the exercise of rights of access for both parents. Japan ratified the Hague Convention in 2014.

At the seminar in Paris, Toshiteru Shibaike, a lawyer sent by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, gave a lecture on the Hague Convention to Japanese parents (mainly mothers) living in France. Shibaike, who wrote The International Human Rights Law Practice Handbook, (co-written with Mikiko Otani, a lawyer and a member of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child) is widely known as a human rights lawyer.

Everything Shibaike said in Paris was recorded by one of the participants. According to the recorded content, he did not advise the participants in a way that was consistent with the spirit of the Hague Convention. This would have been to discuss how couples could divorce amicably whilst putting the needs of their children first. On the contrary, he specifically advised how to violate a child's rights by suggesting how it would be possible to take a child to Japan without having the Hague Convention applied.

For example, he explained, "All of you want to know that after you come back to Japan with your children, they would not be returned even if the claim will be made by the Hague Convention. I would like to talk a little about it...When your case does not meet the requirements of return refusal, none of them are satisfied, then you may think you must return your children if the trial is carried out in Japan. It’s not true because the Japanese court can decide whether to return or not by agreement, which is the unique characteristic of Japanese court and Japanese Hague cases. So you do not need to give up."

Japanese unique rules

The Hague Convention consists of 45 articles. Among them, only two articles refer to the requirements to refuse the return of the child. It is apparent from this that the main focus of this convention is not to refuse to return the child to their habitual living place. This is only allowed in extremely exceptional circumstances. This is understandable as it is a treaty designed to prevent the abduction of children. Nonetheless, Shibaike explained in detail for 30 minutes what to do in order to satisfy the requirements of this return refusal, despite the fact it doesn't apply to the majority of cases. It is highly logical therefore, that this event could be referred to as a Child Abduction Solicitation seminar.

How is it possible to abduct children? The explanation of Shibaike is quoted below:
"Look at the articles briefly. Articles are important, so let's look at them.... There is Article 28. Article 28 provides the grounds for refusal to return. If you satisfy the grounds stated here, you are allowed to not return the child...See this Article 28, it states that the court shall not order the return of a child if there is a grave risk that his/her return to the state of habitual residence would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation... Looking at this paragraph, it seems that the grave risk does not include domestic violence against mothers...But the other paragraph provides that the grave risk as stated above includes a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child, if the respondent and the child entered into the State of habitual residence. The respondent written here means mothers, or all of you. The respondent means those who must respond to the petition based upon the Hague convention. In other words, the respondent is those who take their children. The article provides that whether or not to return the children depends upon the risk that the wife would be subject to violence by her husband to cause psychological harm to the child, if (the wife and) the child comes back to France.”

Anyone who has read the articles of the Hague Convention should be skeptical of Shibaike's explanation. This is because the Hague Convention has no provisions for domestic violence as grounds for refusal of the return of the child.

関連する投稿


森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

朝日をはじめとするマスコミの常軌を逸した森喜朗氏への“集団リンチ”。 朝日の手の内を知り尽くした筆者が、その裏に隠された真の目的を暴く!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!


北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

今こそ問うべきだ。世界を大中華主義で染めたいのか。人権弾圧を続けて民主主義を息絶えさせたいのか。国際法を中華の法の支配に替え、世界秩序を大転換したいのか、と。


『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『目に見えぬ侵略』『見えない手』の入門書と言える『副読本』を発売! 二冊の大著から奥山真司氏監修のもとエッセンスを抜き出し、見開き40項目だけでシンプルに解説しています。その中から三項目を特別公開。今回は二つ目「人権」問題について。


中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

中国の人権侵害を制裁する枠組みを作れ|西岡力

国連に代表される国際社会の人権への取り組みは、中国に対して圧力をかけられない構造的欠陥を抱えている。国連の外で中国の人権侵害を厳しく監視、調査する常設機関を設けることが必要だ。その具体策を探る。


最新の投稿


「岸田ショック」はなぜ起きたのか|和田政宗

「岸田ショック」はなぜ起きたのか|和田政宗

菅総理はなぜ退陣しなければならなかったのか。「総花的でぼんやりしている」との厳しい声に岸田内閣はどう向き合えばいいのか。そして、なぜ、矢野財務次官は月刊誌で「このままでは国家財政は破綻する」と政府批判を展開したのか。「本音」で語れる政治家、和田政宗参議院議員が事の本質に迫る!


歩く風評被害 山本太郎の「放射脳」|坂井広志

歩く風評被害 山本太郎の「放射脳」|坂井広志

「水に流す」という言葉があるが、「水に流せない」こともある。2011年、「高濃度汚染地域・東京から山本太郎です。超高濃度汚染地域、福島・東北にお住まいの皆さん、こんにちは」「避難してください。未来はないです。子供たちを無理心中に引き込まないでください。大人として、子供のためにも疎開してください」と発言した山本太郎を再び、国会議員にしてもいいのか。


【読書亡羊】「もどかしい系議員」と呼びたい 小川淳也・中原一歩『本当に君は総理大臣になれないのか』(講談社現代新書)

【読書亡羊】「もどかしい系議員」と呼びたい 小川淳也・中原一歩『本当に君は総理大臣になれないのか』(講談社現代新書)

その昔、読書にかまけて羊を逃がしたものがいるという。転じて「読書亡羊」は「重要なことを忘れて、他のことに夢中になること」を指す四字熟語になった。だが時に仕事を放り出してでも、読むべき本がある。元月刊『Hanada』編集部員のライター・梶原がお送りする週末書評!


やり直せるのはいいことだけど……|電脳三面記事

やり直せるのはいいことだけど……|電脳三面記事

ビル・ゲイツの妹(という設定)のライターが、ネットで話題になった事を斬りまくる、人気連載「電脳三面記事」。もう忘れられた感がありますが、某メンタリストのやらかしたことを覚えていますか? 失敗してもやり直せるのはいいことですが、加害者だけがやり直せるのはいかがなものでしょうか。


自衛隊は便利屋でいいのか|岩田清文

自衛隊は便利屋でいいのか|岩田清文

新型コロナウイルスワクチンの大規模接種センターは新たな延長期間に入り、対象年齢もが引き下げられ16歳と17歳への接種が始まった。自衛隊が運営しているだけに、接種会場はシステマティックで、見事な運営がされているという。だが、その一方で「近頃、何でもかんでも自衛隊、これでいいのか?」という危惧の声も聞かれる。自衛隊元最高幹部の問題提起!(初出:月刊『Hanada』2021年9月号)