Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


Lawyer who directs parental child abduction

A surprising fact was reported at the House of Councilors Legal Committee on March 24, this year. On May 15, 2018, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Japan Bar Association held the "Legal Custody (Physical Custody) of Children and the Hague Convention Seminar for International Marriage" in Paris, where parents were advised on how to abduct their children.

The Hague Convention is officially called the "Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." In order to solve the international child abduction issue, the convention consists of processes for returning a child to the country of original habitual residence and securing the exercise of rights of access for both parents. Japan ratified the Hague Convention in 2014.

At the seminar in Paris, Toshiteru Shibaike, a lawyer sent by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, gave a lecture on the Hague Convention to Japanese parents (mainly mothers) living in France. Shibaike, who wrote The International Human Rights Law Practice Handbook, (co-written with Mikiko Otani, a lawyer and a member of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child) is widely known as a human rights lawyer.

Everything Shibaike said in Paris was recorded by one of the participants. According to the recorded content, he did not advise the participants in a way that was consistent with the spirit of the Hague Convention. This would have been to discuss how couples could divorce amicably whilst putting the needs of their children first. On the contrary, he specifically advised how to violate a child's rights by suggesting how it would be possible to take a child to Japan without having the Hague Convention applied.

For example, he explained, "All of you want to know that after you come back to Japan with your children, they would not be returned even if the claim will be made by the Hague Convention. I would like to talk a little about it...When your case does not meet the requirements of return refusal, none of them are satisfied, then you may think you must return your children if the trial is carried out in Japan. It’s not true because the Japanese court can decide whether to return or not by agreement, which is the unique characteristic of Japanese court and Japanese Hague cases. So you do not need to give up."

Japanese unique rules

The Hague Convention consists of 45 articles. Among them, only two articles refer to the requirements to refuse the return of the child. It is apparent from this that the main focus of this convention is not to refuse to return the child to their habitual living place. This is only allowed in extremely exceptional circumstances. This is understandable as it is a treaty designed to prevent the abduction of children. Nonetheless, Shibaike explained in detail for 30 minutes what to do in order to satisfy the requirements of this return refusal, despite the fact it doesn't apply to the majority of cases. It is highly logical therefore, that this event could be referred to as a Child Abduction Solicitation seminar.

How is it possible to abduct children? The explanation of Shibaike is quoted below:
"Look at the articles briefly. Articles are important, so let's look at them.... There is Article 28. Article 28 provides the grounds for refusal to return. If you satisfy the grounds stated here, you are allowed to not return the child...See this Article 28, it states that the court shall not order the return of a child if there is a grave risk that his/her return to the state of habitual residence would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation... Looking at this paragraph, it seems that the grave risk does not include domestic violence against mothers...But the other paragraph provides that the grave risk as stated above includes a risk that the respondent would be subject to violence, etc. by the petitioner in such a manner as to cause psychological harm to the child, if the respondent and the child entered into the State of habitual residence. The respondent written here means mothers, or all of you. The respondent means those who must respond to the petition based upon the Hague convention. In other words, the respondent is those who take their children. The article provides that whether or not to return the children depends upon the risk that the wife would be subject to violence by her husband to cause psychological harm to the child, if (the wife and) the child comes back to France.”

Anyone who has read the articles of the Hague Convention should be skeptical of Shibaike's explanation. This is because the Hague Convention has no provisions for domestic violence as grounds for refusal of the return of the child.

関連する投稿


中国によって「自由」を奪われたモンゴルの惨状|山田宏×エンフバット・トゴチョグ

中国によって「自由」を奪われたモンゴルの惨状|山田宏×エンフバット・トゴチョグ

モンゴルで起きている現実は明日の日本でも起こる。中国による人権弾圧を20年以上にわたって訴え続けてきた南モンゴル人権情報センターの代表が7年ぶりに緊急来日。今モンゴルで何が起きているのか? 南モンゴルを支援する議員連盟幹事長の山田宏参議院議員と緊急対談を行った。


森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

森喜朗氏“集団リンチ事件”と朝日新聞|門田隆将

朝日をはじめとするマスコミの常軌を逸した森喜朗氏への“集団リンチ”。 朝日の手の内を知り尽くした筆者が、その裏に隠された真の目的を暴く!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!


北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

北京五輪の開催地変更を求めよ|櫻井よしこ

今こそ問うべきだ。世界を大中華主義で染めたいのか。人権弾圧を続けて民主主義を息絶えさせたいのか。国際法を中華の法の支配に替え、世界秩序を大転換したいのか、と。


『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『「目に見えぬ侵略」「見えない手」副読本』㉔脅かされているのは「人権」そのもの

『目に見えぬ侵略』『見えない手』の入門書と言える『副読本』を発売! 二冊の大著から奥山真司氏監修のもとエッセンスを抜き出し、見開き40項目だけでシンプルに解説しています。その中から三項目を特別公開。今回は二つ目「人権」問題について。


最新の投稿


憲法改正の国会発議はいつでもできる、岸田総理ご決断を!|和田政宗

憲法改正の国会発議はいつでもできる、岸田総理ご決断を!|和田政宗

すでに衆院の憲法審査会では4党1会派の計5会派が、いま行うべき憲法改正の内容について一致している。現在いつでも具体的な条文作業に入れる状況であり、岸田総理が決断すれば一気に進む。


【今週のサンモニ】加藤登紀子が暴いた「サンモニ」のダブスタと不寛容|藤原かずえ

【今週のサンモニ】加藤登紀子が暴いた「サンモニ」のダブスタと不寛容|藤原かずえ

『Hanada』プラス連載「今週もおかしな報道ばかりをしている『サンデーモーニング』を藤原かずえさんがデータとロジックで滅多斬り」、略して【今週のサンモニ】。


【読書亡羊】世界には「反移民で親LGBT」「愛国的環境保護派」が存在する  中井遼『ナショナリズムと政治意識』(光文社新書)

【読書亡羊】世界には「反移民で親LGBT」「愛国的環境保護派」が存在する  中井遼『ナショナリズムと政治意識』(光文社新書)

その昔、読書にかまけて羊を逃がしたものがいるという。転じて「読書亡羊」は「重要なことを忘れて、他のことに夢中になること」を指す四字熟語になった。だが時に仕事を放り出してでも、読むべき本がある。元月刊『Hanada』編集部員のライター・梶原がお送りする時事書評!


【今週のサンモニ】少子化を促進させた『サンモニ』報道|藤原かずえ

【今週のサンモニ】少子化を促進させた『サンモニ』報道|藤原かずえ

『Hanada』プラス連載「今週もおかしな報道ばかりをしている『サンデーモーニング』を藤原かずえさんがデータとロジックで滅多斬り」、略して【今週のサンモニ】。


6月10日施行の改正入管法で一体、何が変わるのか?|和田政宗

6月10日施行の改正入管法で一体、何が変わるのか?|和田政宗

不法滞在者や不法就労者をなくす私の取り組みに対し、SNSをはじめ様々な妨害があった――。だが、改正入管法施行の6月10日以降、誰が正しいことを言っているのか明らかになっていくであろう。(写真提供/時事)