Darkness of child abduction business|Nozomi Makino

Darkness of child abduction business|Nozomi Makino

In Japan today, parental child abductions occur on a daily basis, and false DV claims are fabricated to justify them. A father, whose child was abducted, accuses so-called "human rights groups" of defamation. His case shows their fraudulent business in quite some detail. Their dirty tricks are finally revealed!


Collective lynching by the “human rights” sect

Getty logo

When you return home tired after work, your children rush and say, "Welcome back!" Their small hands hold on to you tightly. You swear to do your best to take care of your dearest children. Such daily happiness is suddenly taken away. When you get home, no one is there. No furniture either. You find it completely empty. Such abductions of children have occurred a lot in this country. The one who abducts the child is a parent (often a mother). In most developed nations, such as the West, this act is regarded as a felony.

However, in Japan, child abduction is not a crime and is practiced on a daily basis under the guidance of lawyers. Suddenly, a parent (usually the father) is deprived of his beloved child, and he can no longer see his child. Despite this situation, he is forced to pay child support, which distresses him mentally and financially and often leads to suicide.

A father, Maki Sotsuda (a pseudonym), one of the victims of such a child abduction, alleges that 39 lawyers and others conspired to defame him in connection with his divorce suit saying, "They fabricated a lie that I was a DV husband who violated my wife." He filed a civil action suit against them. The defendants include lawyers, a former judge, as well as prominent figures such as NPO representatives, university professors, and former editorialists of Asahi Newspaper Company.

The complaint states that their defamation was "a systematic and deliberate offense that is completely different from normal defamation," and "The judge could easily understand how severely I was damaged mentally and financially from the accusation if only the judge could imagine that he himself was the target of such a collective lynching.”

Indeed, if the divorce lawsuit was just an expansion of a marital quarrel, it would not occur that 39 people would conspire to collectively defame the other side. That would be nonsense. The strange thing is that Sotsuda had never met most of the 39 people nor had any acquaintance with them at all. So why did Sotsuda get a collective lynching from 39 lawyers and a former judge whom he did not know? It seems that he tread upon the tigers’ tails of the so-called divorce business.

The 39 defendants, whose professions and affiliations vary, seem at first glance to commit defamation independent of one another. However, according to the complaint, "the defendants have common interests for the abduction of children by parents, which constitutes a criminal offense in the United States and Europe, and for the separation of parents and children, which violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. They all wish these acts could be left unpunished in Japan." They seem to have contacted one another closely and set up a collective lynching of Sotsuda. The complainant provided the evidence of the conspiracy in which Sotsuda's wife (at that time) took the initiative and exchanged emails with each defendant.

Sotsuda’s case depicts clearly the problems of child abduction, which destroys the family, hurts the mind of small children, and forces the abandoned parents into a tight corner. By investigating his case, we can identify the group rigging the kidnapping business. How are judges and lawyers at the center of the group generally involved in child abductions?

Ridiculing a father who is contemplating suicide

Judges usually render custody of a child based on the “principle of continuity” (as described below) to the parent who has kidnapped the child. Lawyers recommend that parents should kidnap their children to ensure the custody of the children. This is not speculation. There is a lot of evidence.

In one women's magazine, a lawyer wrote confidently that "the first thing you have to do to fight against your husband to get the child’s custody is to take your child when leaving home." Also, in a book published by the Research Institute of the Japan Federation of Bar Association (JFBA), there is a sentence at the beginning of its preface: "there is common consensus among lawyers in divorce cases involving a custody conflict: The first step is to secure the child with the client."

When lawyers induce one parent to abduct the child and file for trial, judges are in a position to give custody to the parent as a reward. The lawyers then pocket a portion of the child support, etc., which are taken from the other parent. It is often the case that the lawyers who get advantageous treatment by judges, in return, hire these judges when they retire from the bench. The trick is quite simple. However, many people cannot see through their plot because it is hard to imagine that a lawyer, who should side with the weak, and a judge, who should be neutral and fair, actually collude in this way.

But the reality of the court is completely different from what many would imagine. There is a well-known blog by a court official which was featured in Diet deliberations. The court official ridiculed a parent whose child had been abducted. He wrote, "There is a parent who attempted to commit suicide just because the court does not accept his request. He has a delusion that the court takes sides with his wife’s team. It is really annoying for us that he feels desperate and jumps out a window of the court building. Don’t do it inside the courthouse, for it is troublesome to clean up. Oh, please do it wherever you want as long as you do it out of the court area… hahahaha”

It’s not a delusion. This is the reality happening inside the courts. The darkness of the judicial world awaits you if your child is abducted and your spouse sues for a divorce. Sotsuda cut into the darkness of the community of the "Parental Child Abduction Business” although such business is already a daily occurrence and a big source of income for lawyers. That is why he was almost completely alienated from society by lawyers and judges.

関連する投稿


Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Darkness of child abduction business continued Here are the "Villains" who killed the Hague Convention|Yoshiko Ikeda

Second Special Scoop:Why Japan has become known as the child abduction nation. So-called human rights lawyers and other proponents solicit parental child abduction and have been pulling the strings behind the scenes of this issue. their methods to neutralise the Hague Convention are uncovered in this edition.


The identity of VANK|Fumiaki Yamasaki

The identity of VANK|Fumiaki Yamasaki

At present, "influence operations" is gaining the attention of intelligence agencies all over the world. However, it is not well known that Japan has been exposed to such attacks for many years. Fumiaki Yamasaki reveals the propaganda of Korea's largest anti-Japanese organization, "VANK".


문재인 대통령, 선거 개입의 "전과"(文在寅大統領に選挙介入の"前科")|변희재(邊熙宰)

문재인 대통령, 선거 개입의 "전과"(文在寅大統領に選挙介入の"前科")|변희재(邊熙宰)

"문재인 정권은 울산 시장과 같은 공직자의 선거 뿐만 아니라, 독립적인 민간 단체에까지 개입하고, 반대자나 보수파, 반공파들을 경찰과 검찰의 수사, 정부기관의 감사를 사용하고 섬멸시키고 있다. 보도되지 않는 문재인의 ‘전과’를 고발한다!


문재인 대통령의 ‘반일’로 한국은 멸망한다|경제학 박사 이우연(文在寅大統領の反日で韓国は滅んでしまう|経済学博士・李宇衍(イウヨン)

문재인 대통령의 ‘반일’로 한국은 멸망한다|경제학 박사 이우연(文在寅大統領の反日で韓国は滅んでしまう|経済学博士・李宇衍(イウヨン)

한국에서 베스트셀러가 된 '반일종족주의'의 공동 저자인 낙성대경제연구소 이우연 박사.사무실에서 습격을 받고 "염산을 뿌린다"고 협박을 받으면서도 의연한 태도로 사실을 계속 호소하는 이 박사가 조국에 대한 위기감을 쓴 영혼의 외침!



最新の投稿


英空母とクアッドの共同訓練を提案する|太田文雄

英空母とクアッドの共同訓練を提案する|太田文雄

英空母部隊の東アジア来航時、これにドイツ海軍のみならずフランス海軍も加わったら、英仏独というNATO主要海軍国が揃い踏みすることになり、クアッド(日米豪印4カ国)との共同訓練で中国に対しては強烈なメッセージを発することができる。


あなたたちは北京五輪をボイコットしますか|花田紀凱

あなたたちは北京五輪をボイコットしますか|花田紀凱

《沈黙は賛同であると言われ、強く反省しています。私はいかなる性差別にも反対します》と世界陸上銅メダルの為末大。ならば、問う。「森発言」のどこが「女性差別」にあたるのか。《沈黙は賛同》であるならば、中国が行うウイグルでの「ジェノサイド」にこそ声を上げるべきだ。


『Hanada』編集部オススメ、4月号の「これはウマイ!」

『Hanada』編集部オススメ、4月号の「これはウマイ!」

グルメ通販記事「月刊『Hanada』おすすめ これはウマイ!」、編集部が厳選した今月のオススメはこちら! ぜひ「これはウマイ!」と舌つづみを打ってください。


なべやかん遺産|「究極の癒やしソフビ」

なべやかん遺産|「究極の癒やしソフビ」

芸人にして、日本屈指のコレクターでもある、なべやかん。 そのマニアックなコレクションを紹介する月刊『Hanada』の好評連載「なべやかん遺産」がますますパワーアップして「Hanadaプラス」にお引越し! 今回は「究極の癒やしソフビ」!


森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

森元総理への異常なメディア・リンチ|花田紀凱

「男性は会議が長い」には寛容であり、「女性は会議が長い」にはなぜ不寛容なのか。そもそも森元総理の発言のどこが「女性差別」なのか。大新聞、テレビ、週刊誌、ネット、外国メディアまで揃いも揃って叩きまくる、異常なメディア・リンチに花田編集長が物申す!